2022-08-09 20:24:40
2022-08-08 09:12:49
2022-08-07 16:06:20
1475391
The ruining of "free" and "donation".
Here's another example of how people are entirely confused about what is free and what is not, and why our trade-free approach makes so much sense.
We have added this peer to peer file sharing app to TROMjaro's Library: SoulSeek. This app is great. It allows you to connect with others directly, and share files with them. No server involved. We wanted to share our VideoNeat library on the network. However if you look closely they limit your experience. And if you donate currency to them you get this:

While they call themselves entirely free:

So, it is free, but you have to pay to unlock certain features....makes so much sense indeed!
Actually they call those trades, donations. And the word and concept of "donation" got ruined alongside that of "free". Donations should be voluntary and not used for the purpose of trade. If you "donate" currency to me in return for some features, then that is a trade. You are buying from me. As simple as that.
Therefore our concept of trade free is so simple and destroys all of these nonsensicalities: What Am I Trading? Ask that. And if you do, then you realize that you need to trade currency for Soulseek to give you more features. Therefore this app is not trade-free.
The reason it was added to our TROMjaro library is that either we could not detect this trade since they are charlatan enough to hide them well, or it was not present when the app was added. Needless to say it was immediately removed.
We need more than ever this "trade as the original of most problems" approach and the "trade-free" antidote. Without them we are going into a deep and ugly confusion. A black hole of that! #tromlive
We have added this peer to peer file sharing app to TROMjaro's Library: SoulSeek. This app is great. It allows you to connect with others directly, and share files with them. No server involved. We wanted to share our VideoNeat library on the network. However if you look closely they limit your experience. And if you donate currency to them you get this:
While they call themselves entirely free:
So, it is free, but you have to pay to unlock certain features....makes so much sense indeed!
Actually they call those trades, donations. And the word and concept of "donation" got ruined alongside that of "free". Donations should be voluntary and not used for the purpose of trade. If you "donate" currency to me in return for some features, then that is a trade. You are buying from me. As simple as that.
Therefore our concept of trade free is so simple and destroys all of these nonsensicalities: What Am I Trading? Ask that. And if you do, then you realize that you need to trade currency for Soulseek to give you more features. Therefore this app is not trade-free.
The reason it was added to our TROMjaro library is that either we could not detect this trade since they are charlatan enough to hide them well, or it was not present when the app was added. Needless to say it was immediately removed.
We need more than ever this "trade as the original of most problems" approach and the "trade-free" antidote. Without them we are going into a deep and ugly confusion. A black hole of that! #tromlive
maxmoon ๐ฑ
•Giving people who donate something back is a nice thing (the product doesn't change and nothing changes for non paying users) and it can even motivate people to donate.
As long as it's "useless" (it gives no advantage compared to non paying users) it is more than okay.
I really don't understand what is ruined in this case?
TROM
•Second, they do provide benefits for the software. Permanent username, removal of a possible "annoyance" (donate button), and you get first in line for downloads. These are the things they are selling.
If they would accept donations, then they should not give anything in return for that. Else this is not a donation, it is purchasing. Regardless of what they think of it.
maxmoon ๐ฑ
•But following this logic it is a trade if someone donates something to me and I would say "Thank you!" or if there is an automated system (thank you mail), because this doesn't happen to non supporters.
TROM
•If the SoulSeek people would send "thank yous" and tshirts or whatever to their donors, then maybe we could consider SoulSeek (the software) as trade free since you get whatever everyone gets, regardless if you "donate" to them or not, in terms of that software. But they clearly restrict some features of the software itself, unless you give them currency, and only then they will "unlock" these features.
Rokosun
•@utopify_org
maxmoon ๐ฑ
•If only donors get a t-shirt and non-donors not, donors definitely get something what everyone else don't get and this time it's tangible (compared to a badge in a profile, which is just software/non-tangible).
Even @trom wrote "For one, do not call donations something that you trade."
So how is this NOT a trade?
Rokosun
•According to me, if you give T-shirts for donations then its definitely a trade and not really a "donation". But the trade-free label is usually applied to goods/services..... So if someone provides a trade-free software that stays the same for ones who donate and those who don't, but for the people who donate they give a T-shirt which has nothing to do with the software itself, then how do we look at it? ๐ค
@trom
TROM
•That being said: if you make a video player that is trade-free, so anyone can enjoy it in any regards and do whatever they want with it without trading for that, but you also say that if anyone donates money to the project, they will get a tshirt back - the player itself is still trade-free since everyone gets access to the same player without trading anything for it. The incentive for donations is a separate thi... show more I didn't say that would make the software trade-free but that we could consider it as such. These are "edge" cases and as explained in the
That being said: if you make a video player that is trade-free, so anyone can enjoy it in any regards and do whatever they want with it without trading for that, but you also say that if anyone donates money to the project, they will get a tshirt back - the player itself is still trade-free since everyone gets access to the same player without trading anything for it. The incentive for donations is a separate thing in my view. It can be an interesting discussion however never forget that such edge cases are not that important, what we try to focus on are the more obvious trades and their negative impact, from software that pretends to be free yet they collect your data, to food that can only be accessible if you trade your currency, and so forth.
Rokosun
•@tio @utopify_org
maxmoon ๐ฑ
•From your website: "TROM is a project that aims to showcase in detail the root cause of most of todayโs problems"
Rokosun
•That book specifically deals with this idea and its definition, it'll make you understand the different types of trades there are and how to spot these hidden trades. It also goes a little beyond the trade free concept, with things like VADOSE. You'll definitely learn a lot from it.
@trom @tio
Books
TROMmaxmoon ๐ฑ
•I hope I will get answers to all my questions in the meantime and thanks a lot for helping :)
Aaron likes this.
Rokosun
•@trom @tio
VideoNeat
VideoNeatRokosun
•@trom @tio
Tio
•So I think we can push it as far as to the example from this post. But what we care mostly about are those macro trades that we describe in the book.
Alexio likes this.
maxmoon ๐ฑ
•But if I give a part of the software to my donors, which isn't accessible to non-donors, it's not trade-free.
Wouldn't be the donor badge in a profile already a trade?
Rokosun
•I think it'll be more clear if you look at the T-shirt and software as two separate things, one here is trade-free (software which is the same for all), the other one is not trade-free (T-shirt which only donors get).
But that being said, I think this is an edge case where the line becomes a bit blurry. Like asking if a hyena is a cat or a dog ๐
@trom @tio
Aaron
I go with the recommendation to read the book which has a lot of examples to clarify that. Maybe a short and simple example is wikipedia. If wikipedia would allow me to access it only if I give some money, then wikipedia would not be trade-free. If wikipedia allows me to access it (as trade-free), but if I donate to them I get a t-shirt and otherwise I don't get a t-shirt, then the access to Wikipedia is still trade-free, but the t-shirt is not (since I have to give money to them).
In todays world unfortunately, people/organizations are forced to trade so the main goal is to trade less and create more trade-free chains that support each other. Example: There's an organization called "Foodsharing" in germany and while someone could save food from there, he/she could volunteer and code some software that he/she offers as trade-free for others.... show more
I go with the recommendation to read the book which has a lot of examples to clarify that. Maybe a short and simple example is wikipedia. If wikipedia would allow me to access it only if I give some money, then wikipedia would not be trade-free. If wikipedia allows me to access it (as trade-free), but if I donate to them I get a t-shirt and otherwise I don't get a t-shirt, then the access to Wikipedia is still trade-free, but the t-shirt is not (since I have to give money to them).
In todays world unfortunately, people/organizations are forced to trade so the main goal is to trade less and create more trade-free chains that support each other. Example: There's an organization called "Foodsharing" in germany and while someone could save food from there, he/she could volunteer and code some software that he/she offers as trade-free for others.
We're even showcasing some of the many trade-free goods/services that exist in todays world in a directory: directory.trade-free.org
But the main focus is on explaining why trade is the source of most problems.
2 people like this
TROM and Alexio like this.